From Adam Smith to Artificial Intelligence: A Classical Philosophical Foundation for Reinterpreting the Purpose of the Firm in the Age of Automation

Authors

  • Hamna Rehman Punjab University Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.67265/jsrd.v1.i2.03

Keywords:

Adam Smith, Artificial Intelligence, Firm, Automation, Milton Friedman

Abstract

This article discussed the examination of the evolution of the firm meaning over the course of time by providing a historical and philosophical sight with outlining periods from Adam Smith's labour-based perspectives to Milton Friedman's shareholder primacy, with an eye to how the development of artificial intelligence (AI) and automation have affected these legacy paradigms. The classical perspectives considered the firm as a generator of wealth maximization through profit splitting, while critiques today, such as stakeholder theory and corporate social responsibility, emphasize accountability, social good, and sustainability. It is generally assuming that the rise of AI and automation chimed under the firm paradigm undermines the role of human labour, modified transaction costs, and shifted stakeholder relationships. Managerial, policy and scholarly implications are also considered, focusing on pathways to inclusive capitalistic growth, and ethical deployment of technology and existential contemplation of corporate philosophy. The paper puts forward a future promise of reframing the firm to account for technological disruption.

References

Acemoglu, D., & Johnson, S. (2023). Power and progress: Our thousand-year struggle over technology and prosperity. PublicAffairs.

Acemoglu, D., & Restrepo, P. (2020). Robots and jobs: Evidence from US labour markets. Journal of Political Economy, 128(6), 2188–2244. https://doi.org/10.1086/705716

Adil, K. (2025). Leveraging advanced data techniques in HR analytics: Revolutionizing workforce management. Journal of Social Research Dynamics, 1(1).

Alkhatib, A. (2021). A theory of algorithmic labour. Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-49

Bankins, S., & Formosa, P. (2023). The ethical implications of artificial intelligence (AI) for meaningful work. Journal of Business Ethics, 185(4), 725–740. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-023-05339-7

Brynjolfsson, E., Rock, D., & Syverson, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence and the modern productivity paradox: A clash of expectations and statistics. In A. Agrawal, J. Gans, & A. Goldfarb (Eds.), The economics of artificial intelligence: An agenda (pp. 23–57). University of Chicago Press.

Coase, R. H. (1937). The nature of the firm. Economica, 4(16), 386–405. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0335.1937.tb00002.x

Coeckelbergh, M. (2022). AI ethics. MIT Press.

Csaszar, F. A., Ketkar, H., & Kim, H. (2024). Artificial intelligence and strategic decision-making: Evidence from entrepreneurs and investors. Strategy Science, 9(4), 322–345. https://doi.org/10.1287/stsc.2024.0190

Davenport, T. H., Guha, A., Grewal, D., & Bressgott, T. (2020). How artificial intelligence will change the future of marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 48(1), 24–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-019-00696-0

Deloitte. (2024). Leadership, governance and workforce decision-making about ethical AI. https://www.deloitte.com/us/en/about/press-room/deloitte-study-c-level-leaders-prioritize-ethical-decision-making-to-guide-the-development-and-use-of-ai.html

Dogan, M., Jacquillat, A., & Yildirim, P. (2024). Strategic automation and decision-making authority. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 33(1), 203–246. https://doi.org/10.1111/jems.12557

Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65–91. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9503271992

Dwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, L., Baabdullah, A. M., et al. (2021). Artificial intelligence (AI): Multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 57, 101994. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.08.002

Edmans, A. (2020). Grow the pie: How great companies deliver both purpose and profit. Cambridge University Press.

Floridi, L., Cowls, J., Beltrametti, M., Chatila, R., Chazerand, P., Dignum, V., Luetge, C., Madelin, R., Pagallo, U., Rossi, F., Schafer, B., Valcke, P., & Vayena, E. (2018). AI4People—An ethical framework for a good AI society. Minds and Machines, 28(4), 689–707. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-018-9482-5

Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman.

Friedman, M. (1970, September 13). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. The New York Times Magazine. https://www.nytimes.com/1970/09/13/archives/a-friedman-doctrine-the-social-responsibility-of-business-is-to.html

George, G., Merrill, R. K., & Schillebeeckx, S. J. D. (2021). Digital sustainability and entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 45(5), 999–1027.

Heath, J. (2014). Morality, competition, and the firm: The market failures approach to business ethics. Oxford University Press.

Jarrahi, M. H., Memariani, A., & Guha, S. (2023). The principles of human–AI collaboration. Communications of the ACM, 66(8), 84–90.

Lin, L. W. (2023). Corporate purpose and stakeholder governance in China: Recent developments in Chinese company law. European Business Organization Law Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40804-023-00304-8

Maiti, M., Kayal, P., & Vujko, A. (2025). A study on ethical implications of artificial intelligence adoption in business: Challenges and best practices. Future Business Journal, 11(1), Article 34. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-025-00462-5

Mayer, C. (2018). Prosperity: Better business makes the greater good. Oxford University Press.

Mayer, C. (2021). Capitalism and crisis: How to fix them. Oxford University Press.

Pant, A., Hoda, R., Spiegler, S. V., Tantithamthavorn, C., & Turhan, B. (2024). Ethics in the age of AI: An analysis of AI practitioners' awareness and challenges. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology, 33(3), Article 80. https://doi.org/10.1145/3635715

Rai, A. (2020). Explainable AI: From black box to glass box. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 48(1), 137–141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-019-00710-5

Segrestin, B., & Levillain, K. (2023). Profit-with-purpose corporations: Why purpose needs law and why it matters for management. European Management Review, 20(4), 733–740. https://doi.org/10.1111/emre.12628

Smith, A. (1776). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. University of Chicago Press.

Susskind, R. (2020). A world without work: Technology, automation, and how we should respond. Metropolitan Books.

Ur Rehman, M. (2025). Integrating total quality management and human resources management in hospitality: A case study of Swissotel Hotel & Resort. Journal of Social Research Dynamics, 1(1).

Downloads

Published

2025-12-10

Issue

Vol. 1 No. 2 (2025): Journal of Social Research Dynamics

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Social Research Dynamics

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

All articles published in this journal are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).

This license allows anyone to:

  • Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format

  • Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially

Under the following terms:

  • Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.

Full license details: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Authors retain copyright of their work and grant the journal the right of first publication.